Politics in the 2015 Canadian election. It really sucks. Two weeks to go and the Conservatives are heading for another majority government. And here is why:
Attack advertisements. They work. They attack the integrity and the character of the target in the ad. The Conservatives have been attacking the Liberal leader telling people that 'He is just not ready yet'.
Not speaking, Not engaging. It is working. You see there is a lot of things about the Conservative ideology that most people find vile, but if their candidates don't talk to people, they will never hear about these views and people will think they are good people. It is working.
Focusing on non issues. Racist issues. It is working. There is, unfortunately, a lot of closeted racists in this country and the Conservatives have found a way to let people express their racism and shroud themselves in a cloak of Women's Rights— which they don't technically believe. It is working.
Details.
Justin Trudeau is in fact my age. He is 43. Stephen Harper is 56. Thomas Mulcair is 60. Harper was Prime Minister at age 46. It is quite clear from this information that either three years is a lot, or that Harper was also not ready. Trudeau is young, but only in comparison to how people compare him. He is not his father and that is good–his father is dead and that would make him too old. He is younger than a lot people in this country, the median age in 2011 was 40.6. So for the record, if you are calling a 43 year old not ready yet, you are calling half of the people in this country note ready yet too. But really age is the last factor that people should use to select a leader. Leaders are just the head of the Party, they have a whole Party behind them with all the experience that they need.
Not speaking or engaging. It is something they started doing from the first. They gagged the government scientists and the librarians, and everyone who gets there checks from the federal government. Leading edge scientific researchers not allowed to talk about what they researched and found out. World Leading People gagged. If you can't control Physics, you can control the people who figure it out. Throughout their reign they have been quietly shutting down science stations and science projects and gagging the scientists affected. The excuses have been the same, the programs cost too much money, and/or the services they do are redundant and the data they get is redundant. Typically, these projects are environmental in nature and they are inexpensive and unique to the world facilities. Like the Experimental Lakes research area. And the High Latitudes High Altitude testing project— the data was used all over the world to monitor changes in the atmosphere; it was cheap (less than the cost of an ad campaign) and was unique.
Carry on to the election, individual candidates are unavailable for comment, unavailable to participate in debates, interviews and unsanctioned party events. They reason is clear, Conservative candidates are being controlled to prevent them going off the official Party Line script. When they go off the script is when we see who these people are. We saw that the Conservative Party attracts people who pee in customer's mugs and then rinse them out and put them away when while they work, instead of using the bathroom. We see that in their off time they post videos on YouTube making fun of people with physical disabilities. We saw that when Conservatives want to be nominated they use bribery and political strong arming to get their way. These examples are things that we see from before the election, but we don't get to see what they are like during. If they are elected, they are required to sit on their bench and tow the party line and be quiet. But their strategy is working, except for the two videos of two candidates, there have been no scandals and apart from the one public scandal, a year before the election, we know nothing about how the people who are running got there. They all do it. Theoretically. Only the Conservatives and the Liberals have been caught bribing and controlling possible candidates.
Niqāb.
All women in some Muslim countries are forced to wear head coverings. It is a human rights issue and it is a women's rights issue. It is wrong. The reasons that men give when they do this are also wrong. They say that seeing a beautiful face will cause men to want to rape them and stuff like that. Rape is high in those countries despite the niqāb. Seeing a woman's face, makes them human, not seeing it makes them objects. The niqāb is just a sign of the issues that these women face, it goes along with other issues like being property and not having rights that men have. The niqāb itself is really not the problem, it is just a piece of cloth; it is the ideas that are surrounding it that are the issues.
When people come to this country they are alone. Not really alone, but before they were around people that were the same as them and everywhere. When they get here, everyone is different and they may feel lost in the tide. Sometimes they grip hard on something that provides a cultural identity. They become more religious, they hold stronger to cultural affectations, or they keep an iron grip on some aspect of their former land language and marriage beliefs. It is one of the pluses of a multiethnic society that we can accept these things and allow them. Because what ever they are, it is their choice to use them and have them except that as Canadians they also have rights and freedoms that supersede these cultural artifacts.
A Canadian cannot be discriminated on the basis of gender or sexual preferences, nor on cultural practices that do not affect other people's own rights. This is not true in practice, people are people and they discriminate on gender, sexual preference and culture, but these people who are discriminated can seek redress for that discrimination. And they do, and they succeed. Sihk men are allowed to wear turbans as part of their uniform as policemen and other jobs. Sihk men can wear a Kirpan, a ceremonial knife. Jewish men can wear a Kippah. Christians can wear a cross. Women can wear a niqāb to citizenship ceremonies. And that is the issue, their face is covered and you don't know who it could be, except the actual paperwork/meeting is in private and the person's face is uncovered, drivers licenses and passport photos are uncovered— and the women do not object to that, but in public they wish to be covered. And the courts say, that this is fine, more they say that it is their right.
I heard two interviews recently. One was a politician, who culturally hails from the Middle East. He said that 95% of women in Canada from his background do not wear the niqāb and it is not an issue, but some do, and that should not be an issue. Hyperbole aside, he suggested that most women do not want to wear a niqāb. Most cultural affections disappear in Canada after a generation and some people chose different things to grab hold of. And the niqāb makes sense for our Winters, maybe everyone should wear one then. The second interview was with a white woman who decided to convert to Islam and decided she wanted to wear a niqāb. A unique perspective, she can tell you what sort of discrimination people have in their hearts, because she never had it before. She described that the abuse came in two forms, active: spitting on her, revving cars and jerking cars at her on crosswalks and verbal abuse, passive: where people avoided her out of fear. Because every woman with a face covering is a suicide bomber. Suicide vests can fit under any coat these days, people must be terrified during winter. Hockey bags can carry almost every kind of assault rifle and most modern weapons of mass destruction, but we are not afraid of them.
They look different. That is it. No one is forcing them to wear a niqāb unless they live at home still and their parents tell them they have to, but then if this were a crime we would have to arrest every parent that had ever said, "You are not walking out that door wearing that!" Well I guess we are going to start discriminating women wearing a sari. Men who wear kilts.
To be clear, Conservatives are not opposing the women's right to wear a niqāb because of it is oppressing women, they are opposing it because they and a lot of people are afraid of people who are different and it will get them votes. And the discussion of women wearing cloth face coverings deflects people about how Canada has had the worst growth rate of all the G8 nations during the time that they have been in power. It is deflecting from their environmental record that seems to be identical to the former Alberta Conservative Government's Environmental Policy: Tell everyone that we have the best policy, that we have an integrated renewable power infrastructure, without ACTUALLY having one. Does Canada actually have an environmental policy? The people implementing it can't talk to us do to gag orders, so for all we know, they have a made in Alberta Environment Plan.
There are issues that people want to know in this election, but one Political Party won't talk to us about them, when it does talk it is about running down other people's image or about issues that have nothing to do with the actual running of the government.
Remember when you vote on October 19th, 2015 are you voting for a Party that won't tell you anything except everyone else is incompetent and we are doing a good job.