DNA reliant

Have we become too dependent on modern forensics evidence?  When they killed Tina Fontaine they wrapped her body up in a duvet and weighed it down with rocks and dumped it into the Red River.  All the hairs that came off the duvet did not match the suspect and this was part of the reason why he was exonerated of charges.  Never mind that he had been reported saying that he did not know she was 15.  That is below the age of consensual sex.  And that he might have been mad about that fact.  Which is circumstantial evidence.  

I mean most women are murdered by men.  Most murdered people were killed by people they knew.  And by that I mean over ninety percent.  If she was killed because she was 15 and was assumed to be 16 well that is a shame.  No really.  I mean look at all those young women out there that look older than they are and they are just asking to be fucked.  Except they aren't.  I mean if you are looking for young women to have sex with it is on you to make sure what age they are.  If you are twenty and you see a girl about your ageist is one thing.  If you are thirty then you have to practice some restraint. 

I know.  I worked in a middle school with 12-14 year olds.  I know what they look like.  I know there are a lot of young women that look … older.  But, that is no excuse and you don't kill them if you sleep with them.  

It took them months to find her body, when they found her they could not tell how she died.  They could not find any DNA evidence.  But.  But they knew who was associated with her.  They knew stuff about him, but they did not have DNA evidence.  Before there was such a thing as DNA evidence, he would likely be going away.  But no DNA evidence to put him with the body.